Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)

Denmark
92.31
in 2014
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
92.31
in 2014
Denmark rank
3rd
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
3rd

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time

  • Denmark
  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 92.31 against 92.31 in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 3rd and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 3rd of 183 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Difference Ahead
2000s 92.31 84.62 7.69 Denmark
2010s 92.31 92.31 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Denmark or Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
Denmark, at 92.31 against 92.31 in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
Denmark ranks 3rd and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-documents-to-import-number-db06-15-methodology-score/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-documents-to-import-number-db06-15-methodology-score/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/">Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.