Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 13.05 in 2014. ◆ Volatile
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Kazakhstan, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 13.05 for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in 2014.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 12.2% on the previous year and down 26.4% over five years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Kazakhstan peaked at 30.13 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2005.
Kazakhstan ranks 175th of 184 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 17.74 | — |
| 2010 | 21.72 | +22.4% |
| 2011 | 30.13 | +38.7% |
| 2012 | 14.39 | -52.3% |
| 2013 | 14.86 | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 13.05 | -12.2% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 13.05 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 79.55, 16% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 13.05 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 84.79, 15% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.55 | 0 | 17.74 | 5 |
| 2010s | 18.83 | 13.05 | 30.13 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 172 Niger 26.64 compare
- 173 Mali 25.93 compare
- 174 Rwanda 17.93 compare
- 176 Afghanistan 5.68 compare
- 177 Central African Republic 0 compare
- 177 Chad 0
- 177 Congo 0 compare
- 177 Kyrgyzstan 0 compare
- 177 Tajikistan 0
- 177 Uzbekistan 0
- 177 Zambia 0 compare
- 177 Zimbabwe 0 compare
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Kazakhstan?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Kazakhstan was 13.05 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 30.13 in 2011.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2005.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 175th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.