Congo vs Kazakhstan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Congo
0
in 2014
Kazakhstan
13.05
in 2014
Congo rank
174th
Kazakhstan rank
172nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Congo
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 13.05 against 0 in Congo, a difference of 13.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 174th and Kazakhstan ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.42 | 3.55 | 42.87 | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 | 18.83 | 18.83 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Congo or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 13.05 against 0 in Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 13.05, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Congo ranks 174th and Kazakhstan ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.