Central African Republic vs Kazakhstan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Central African Republic
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 13.05 against 0 in Central African Republic, a difference of 13.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 176th and Kazakhstan ranks 174th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.03 | 3.55 | 7.49 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0 | 18.83 | 18.83 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Central African Republic or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 13.05 against 0 in Central African Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Central African Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 13.05, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Central African Republic and Kazakhstan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Central African Republic ranks 176th and Kazakhstan ranks 174th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.