Kazakhstan vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Kazakhstan
13.05
in 2014
Zimbabwe
0
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
174th
Zimbabwe rank
176th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 13.05 against 0 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 13.05.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 174th and Zimbabwe ranks 176th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.55 | 23.21 | 19.66 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 18.83 | 7.84 | 10.99 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Kazakhstan or Zimbabwe?
- Kazakhstan, at 13.05 against 0 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Kazakhstan and Zimbabwe?
- 13.05, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kazakhstan and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 174th and Zimbabwe ranks 176th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.