Kazakhstan vs Mali: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Kazakhstan
13.05
in 2014
Mali
25.93
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
174th
Mali rank
172nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 25.93 against 13.05 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 12.88.
That makes Mali's figure about 2.0 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 174th and Mali ranks 172nd of 183 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.55 | 36.14 | 32.59 | Mali |
| 2010s | 18.83 | 35.87 | 17.04 | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Kazakhstan or Mali?
- Mali, at 25.93 against 13.05 in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Kazakhstan and Mali?
- 12.88, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mali?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mali rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 174th and Mali ranks 172nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.