Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Rwanda
Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 17.93 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Rwanda, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Rwanda recorded 17.93 for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in 2014.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 59.7% on the previous year and up 60.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Rwanda peaked at 44.55 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 9.59, in 2007.
Rwanda ranks 174th of 184 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 11.2 | — |
| 2006 | 19.45 | +73.7% |
| 2007 | 9.59 | -50.7% |
| 2008 | 17.15 | +78.7% |
| 2009 | 27.69 | +61.5% |
| 2010 | 34.23 | +23.6% |
| 2011 | 35.98 | +5.1% |
| 2012 | 40.87 | +13.6% |
| 2013 | 44.55 | +9.0% |
| 2014 | 17.93 | -59.7% |
Rwanda compared with similar countries
- Rwanda's 17.93 is below the median for low income countries, which is 50.3, 36% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Rwanda's 17.93 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 70.57, 25% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.02 | 9.59 | 27.69 | 5 |
| 2010s | 34.71 | 17.93 | 44.55 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 171 Burundi 28.06 compare
- 172 Niger 26.64 compare
- 173 Mali 25.93 compare
- 175 Kazakhstan 13.05 compare
- 176 Afghanistan 5.68 compare
- 177 Central African Republic 0 compare
- 177 Chad 0
- 177 Congo 0 compare
- 177 Kyrgyzstan 0 compare
- 177 Tajikistan 0
- 177 Uzbekistan 0
- 177 Zambia 0 compare
- 177 Zimbabwe 0 compare
More reference data data for Rwanda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2282 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1223 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7651 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Rwanda?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Rwanda was 17.93 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 44.55 in 2013.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.59 in 2007.
- How does Rwanda rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Rwanda ranks 174th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 60.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.