Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Mali
Mali: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 25.93 in 2014. ▼ Falling
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Mali, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Mali recorded 25.93 for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in 2014. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 21.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Mali peaked at 45.33 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 25.93, in 2014.
That places Mali 173rd out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Mali, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 32.97 | — |
| 2006 | 34.73 | +5.3% |
| 2007 | 38.39 | +10.5% |
| 2008 | 34.95 | -8.9% |
| 2009 | 39.64 | +13.4% |
| 2010 | 39.65 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 42.34 | +6.8% |
| 2012 | 45.33 | +7.1% |
| 2013 | 26.1 | -42.4% |
| 2014 | 25.93 | -0.7% |
Mali compared with similar countries
- Mali's 25.93 is below the median for low income countries, which is 50.3, 52% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Mali's 25.93 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 70.57, 37% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.14 | 32.97 | 39.64 | 5 |
| 2010s | 35.87 | 25.93 | 45.33 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mali
- 170 Burkina Faso 29.65 compare
- 171 Burundi 28.06 compare
- 172 Niger 26.64 compare
- 174 Rwanda 17.93 compare
- 175 Kazakhstan 13.05 compare
- 176 Afghanistan 5.68 compare
More reference data data for Mali
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3081 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4025 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4728 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 39.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 47.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.19 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Mali?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Mali was 25.93 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Mali?
- The highest recorded value was 45.33 in 2012.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Mali?
- The lowest recorded value was 25.93 in 2014.
- How does Mali rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Mali ranks 173rd out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Mali?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mali data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.