Kazakhstan vs Niger: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Kazakhstan
13.05
in 2014
Niger
26.64
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
172nd
Niger rank
169th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Kazakhstan
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 26.64 against 13.05 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 13.59.
That makes Niger's figure about 2.0 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 172nd and Niger ranks 169th of 181 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.55 | 34.68 | 31.14 | Niger |
| 2010s | 18.83 | 35.31 | 16.48 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Kazakhstan or Niger?
- Niger, at 26.64 against 13.05 in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Kazakhstan and Niger?
- 13.59, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Niger?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kazakhstan and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Kazakhstan ranks 172nd and Niger ranks 169th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.