Barbados vs Côte d'Ivoire: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Barbados
33.33
in 2013
Côte d'Ivoire
33.33
in 2013
Barbados rank
153rd
Côte d'Ivoire rank
153rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Barbados
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 153rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Barbados or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Barbados, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Barbados and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Barbados and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Barbados ranks 153rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.