Congo, Republic of vs Côte d'Ivoire: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Congo, Republic of
33.33
in 2013
Côte d'Ivoire
33.33
in 2013
Congo, Republic of rank
152nd
Côte d'Ivoire rank
152nd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Congo, Republic of
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Congo, Republic of currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Congo, Republic of ranks 152nd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Republic of | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Congo, Republic of or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Congo, Republic of, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Congo, Republic of and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Congo, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Congo, Republic of and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Congo, Republic of ranks 152nd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.