Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in New Zealand

New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 92.13 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
92.13
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
2nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
92.13
in 2003
All-time low
92.13
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in New Zealand, 2003–2019

0204060801002003201120192003: 92.12004: 92.12005: 92.12006: 92.12007: 92.12008: 92.12009: 92.12010: 92.12011: 92.12012: 92.12013: 92.12014: 92.12015: 92.12016: 92.12017: 92.12018: 92.12019: 92.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

New Zealand recorded 92.13 for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in New Zealand peaked at 92.13 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 92.13, in 2003.

New Zealand ranks 2nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in New Zealand, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 92.13 —
2004 92.13 +0.0%
2005 92.13 +0.0%
2006 92.13 +0.0%
2007 92.13 +0.0%
2008 92.13 +0.0%
2009 92.13 +0.0%
2010 92.13 +0.0%
2011 92.13 +0.0%
2012 92.13 +0.0%
2013 92.13 +0.0%
2014 92.13 +0.0%
2015 92.13 +0.0%
2016 92.13 +0.0%
2017 92.13 +0.0%
2018 92.13 +0.0%
2019 92.13 +0.0%

New Zealand compared with similar countries

  • New Zealand's 92.13 is above the median for high income countries, which is 64.39, 1.4× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • New Zealand's 92.13 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 73.57, 1.3× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 92.13 92.13 92.13 7
2010s 92.13 92.13 92.13 10

Countries ranked near New Zealand

  1. 1 Singapore 96.39 compare
  2. 3 Bhutan 91.39 compare
  3. 3 Uzbekistan 91.39 compare
  4. 5 South Sudan 91.15 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for New Zealand

All data for New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in New Zealand?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in New Zealand was 92.13 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 92.13 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 92.13 in 2003.
How does New Zealand rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
New Zealand ranks 2nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in New Zealand?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in New Zealand. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/new-zealand/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.