Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 91.39 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
91.39
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
3rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
91.39
in 2003
All-time low
91.39
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Uzbekistan, 2003–2019

0204060801002003201120192003: 91.42004: 91.42005: 91.42006: 91.42007: 91.42008: 91.42009: 91.42010: 91.42011: 91.42012: 91.42013: 91.42014: 91.42015: 91.42016: 91.42017: 91.42018: 91.42019: 91.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Uzbekistan stood at 91.39. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Uzbekistan peaked at 91.39 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 91.39, in 2003.

That places Uzbekistan 3rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Uzbekistan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Uzbekistan, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 91.39
2004 91.39 +0.0%
2005 91.39 +0.0%
2006 91.39 +0.0%
2007 91.39 +0.0%
2008 91.39 +0.0%
2009 91.39 +0.0%
2010 91.39 +0.0%
2011 91.39 +0.0%
2012 91.39 +0.0%
2013 91.39 +0.0%
2014 91.39 +0.0%
2015 91.39 +0.0%
2016 91.39 +0.0%
2017 91.39 +0.0%
2018 91.39 +0.0%
2019 91.39 +0.0%

Uzbekistan compared with similar countries

  • Uzbekistan's 91.39 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 1.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Uzbekistan's 91.39 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 68.03, 1.3× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 91.39 91.39 91.39 7
2010s 91.39 91.39 91.39 10

Countries ranked near Uzbekistan

  1. 1 Singapore 96.39 compare
  2. 2 New Zealand 92.13 compare
  3. 3 Bhutan 91.39 compare
  4. 5 South Sudan 91.15 compare
  5. 6 Rwanda 90.98 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Uzbekistan

All data for Uzbekistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Uzbekistan?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Uzbekistan was 91.39 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Uzbekistan?
The highest recorded value was 91.39 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Uzbekistan?
The lowest recorded value was 91.39 in 2003.
How does Uzbekistan rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Uzbekistan ranks 3rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Uzbekistan. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/uzbekistan/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Uzbekistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.