New Zealand vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

New Zealand
92.13
in 2019
Uzbekistan
91.39
in 2019
New Zealand rank
2nd
Uzbekistan rank
3rd

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • New Zealand
  • Uzbekistan
020406080100200320112019

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 92.13 against 91.39 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.74.

Across all 17 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 188 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 92.13 91.39 0.7377 New Zealand
2010s 92.13 91.39 0.7377 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, New Zealand or Uzbekistan?
New Zealand, at 92.13 against 91.39 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
0.74, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do New Zealand and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
New Zealand ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.