What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in South Sudan?

Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in South Sudan was 91.15 in 2019, according to the World Bank.

What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in South Sudan?

The highest recorded value was 91.15 in 2012.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in South Sudan?

The lowest recorded value was 91.15 in 2012.

How does South Sudan rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?

South Sudan ranks 5th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in South Sudan?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this South Sudan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in South Sudan

Name: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in South Sudan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 91.15 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

91.15

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

5th

of 188 countries

All-time high

91.15

in 2012

All-time low

91.15

in 2012

Years of data

2012–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in South Sudan, 2012–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in South Sudan is 91.15, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

South Sudan ranks 5th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Countries ranked near South Sudan

2 New Zealand 92.13 compare
3 Bhutan 91.39 compare
3 Uzbekistan 91.39 compare
6 Rwanda 90.98 compare
7 Belarus 87.3 compare
8 Azerbaijan 87.13 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for South Sudan

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0368 (2019)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3667 (2019)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7 (2019)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.41 (2019)
Spring temperature anomalies -2.16 °C (2026)
Temperature anomalies by month -0.2213 °C (2026)
Summer temperature anomalies 2.51 °C (2026)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 26,453 (2019)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 684.53 (2019)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 325.82 (2019)

All data for South Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in South Sudan?: Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in South Sudan was 91.15 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in South Sudan?: The highest recorded value was 91.15 in 2012.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in South Sudan?: The lowest recorded value was 91.15 in 2012.
How does South Sudan rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?: South Sudan ranks 5th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in South Sudan?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this South Sudan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.