New Zealand vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
New Zealand
92.13
in 2019
Singapore
96.39
in 2019
New Zealand rank
2nd
Singapore rank
1st
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 96.39 against 92.13 in New Zealand, a difference of 4.26.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.13 | 99.3 | 7.17 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 92.13 | 96.62 | 4.49 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, New Zealand or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 96.39 against 92.13 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 4.26, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.