Bhutan vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Bhutan
91.39
in 2019
New Zealand
92.13
in 2019
Bhutan rank
3rd
New Zealand rank
2nd
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Bhutan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 92.13 against 91.39 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.74.
Across all 17 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.47 | 92.13 | 3.67 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 91.39 | 92.13 | 0.7377 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Bhutan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 92.13 against 91.39 in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Bhutan and New Zealand?
- 0.74, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and New Zealand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Bhutan ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.