Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Bhutan

Bhutan: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 91.39 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
91.39
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
3rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
91.39
in 2008
All-time low
87.3
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Bhutan, 2003–2019

0204060801002003201120192003: 87.32004: 87.32005: 87.32006: 87.32007: 87.32008: 91.42009: 91.42010: 91.42011: 91.42012: 91.42013: 91.42014: 91.42015: 91.42016: 91.42017: 91.42018: 91.42019: 91.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Bhutan stood at 91.39. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Bhutan peaked at 91.39 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 87.3, in 2003.

That places Bhutan 3rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Bhutan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Bhutan, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 87.3
2004 87.3 +0.0%
2005 87.3 +0.0%
2006 87.3 +0.0%
2007 87.3 +0.0%
2008 91.39 +4.7%
2009 91.39 +0.0%
2010 91.39 +0.0%
2011 91.39 +0.0%
2012 91.39 +0.0%
2013 91.39 +0.0%
2014 91.39 +0.0%
2015 91.39 +0.0%
2016 91.39 +0.0%
2017 91.39 +0.0%
2018 91.39 +0.0%
2019 91.39 +0.0%

Bhutan compared with similar countries

  • Bhutan's 91.39 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 1.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Bhutan's 91.39 is above the median for South Asia, which is 18.52, 4.9× the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 88.47 87.3 91.39 7
2010s 91.39 91.39 91.39 10

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 1 Singapore 96.39 compare
  2. 2 New Zealand 92.13 compare
  3. 3 Uzbekistan 91.39 compare
  4. 5 South Sudan 91.15 compare
  5. 6 Rwanda 90.98 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Bhutan?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Bhutan was 91.39 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 91.39 in 2008.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 87.3 in 2003.
How does Bhutan rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Bhutan ranks 3rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Bhutan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Bhutan. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/bhutan/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Bhutan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.