New Zealand vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
New Zealand
92.13
in 2019
South Sudan
91.15
in 2019
New Zealand rank
2nd
South Sudan rank
5th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- South Sudan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 92.13 against 91.15 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.98.
Across all 8 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 2nd and South Sudan ranks 5th of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, New Zealand or South Sudan?
- New Zealand, at 92.13 against 91.15 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 0.98, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 2nd and South Sudan ranks 5th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.