How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Hong Kong, China?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Czechia

52.78

in 2019

Hong Kong, China

55.56

in 2019

Czechia rank

63rd

Hong Kong, China rank

61st

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

Czechia
Hong Kong, China

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 55.56 against 52.78 in Czechia, a difference of 2.78.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 63rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 61st of 191 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Czechia or Hong Kong, China?: Hong Kong, China, at 55.56 against 52.78 in Czechia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Czechia and Hong Kong, China?: 2.78, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Hong Kong, China?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Czechia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?: Czechia ranks 63rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 61st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/czechia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/czechia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Czechia vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.