Hong Kong, China vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Hong Kong, China
55.56
in 2019
Mexico
56.08
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
61st
Mexico rank
60th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 56.08 against 55.56 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.52.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 60th of 191 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Hong Kong, China or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 56.08 against 55.56 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Hong Kong, China and Mexico?
- 0.52, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 60th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.