Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 55.56 against 52.78 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 2.78.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 61st of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 55.56 against 52.78 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China?
- 2.78, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 61st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.