Hong Kong, China vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Hong Kong, China
55.56
in 2019
New Zealand
52.78
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
61st
New Zealand rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 55.56 against 52.78 in New Zealand, a difference of 2.78.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was New Zealand ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and New Zealand ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Hong Kong, China or New Zealand?
- Hong Kong, China, at 55.56 against 52.78 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Hong Kong, China and New Zealand?
- 2.78, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and New Zealand ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.