Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu

Tuvalu: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
21st
of 208 countries
All-time high
1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 1996
All-time low
0.5324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2013
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tuvalu, 1996–2025

00.511.51996201020251996: 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.51998: 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52000: 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52002: 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52003: 0.917 approx. -2.5 to +2.52004: 0.68 approx. -2.5 to +2.52005: 0.795 approx. -2.5 to +2.52006: 0.721 approx. -2.5 to +2.52007: 0.652 approx. -2.5 to +2.52008: 0.653 approx. -2.5 to +2.52009: 0.653 approx. -2.5 to +2.52010: 0.652 approx. -2.5 to +2.52011: 0.654 approx. -2.5 to +2.52012: 0.538 approx. -2.5 to +2.52013: 0.532 approx. -2.5 to +2.52014: 0.624 approx. -2.5 to +2.52015: 0.625 approx. -2.5 to +2.52016: 0.624 approx. -2.5 to +2.52017: 0.623 approx. -2.5 to +2.52018: 0.983 approx. -2.5 to +2.52019: 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52020: 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52021: 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52022: 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52023: 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52024: 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52025: 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tuvalu stood at 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That represents a change of down 0.1% on the previous year and up 101.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tuvalu peaked at 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.5324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.

Tuvalu ranks 21st of 208 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu, 1996 to 2025.
Year approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Change
1996 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 —
1998 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1%
2000 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.1%
2002 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -20.9%
2003 0.9169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -12.3%
2004 0.6801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -25.8%
2005 0.795 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +16.9%
2006 0.7213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -9.3%
2007 0.6517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -9.6%
2008 0.6527 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.2%
2009 0.6532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.1%
2010 0.652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2%
2011 0.6539 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.3%
2012 0.5379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -17.7%
2013 0.5324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.0%
2014 0.6244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +17.3%
2015 0.6248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.1%
2016 0.6239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1%
2017 0.6231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1%
2018 0.9832 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +57.8%
2019 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +22.0%
2020 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -15.9%
2021 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +3.8%
2022 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.2%
2023 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1%
2024 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +20.3%
2025 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1%

Tuvalu compared with similar countries

  • Tuvalu's 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
  • Tuvalu's 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 3.8× the median. (36 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2018 +57.8% 0.6231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9832 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
2004 -25.8% 0.9169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2
2000s 0.8266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 9
2010s 0.7055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 10
2020s 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 6

Countries ranked near Tuvalu

  1. 18 Liechtenstein 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  2. 19 United Kingdom 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  3. 20 Portugal 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  4. 22 San Marino 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  5. 23 Uruguay 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  6. 24 Czechia 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Tuvalu

All data for Tuvalu →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tuvalu?
Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tuvalu was 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
The highest recorded value was 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
The lowest recorded value was 0.5324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
How does Tuvalu rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Tuvalu ranks 21st out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Tuvalu?
Over the last ten years it is up 101.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tuvalu. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/tuvalu/">Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tuvalu</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.