Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tuvalu
Tuvalu: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tuvalu, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tuvalu stood at 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of up 27.2% on the previous year and up 126.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tuvalu peaked at 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.
Tuvalu ranks 25th of 207 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tuvalu, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2000 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2002 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.7% |
| 2003 | 0.9466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.2% |
| 2004 | 0.6073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -35.8% |
| 2005 | 0.7149 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.7% |
| 2006 | 0.6238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.7% |
| 2007 | 0.5573 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.7% |
| 2008 | 0.5562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2009 | 0.5564 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.5552 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 0.5574 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2012 | 0.4271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.4% |
| 2013 | 0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2014 | 0.5239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.5% |
| 2015 | 0.5246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.5238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2017 | 0.5231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2018 | 0.8922 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +70.6% |
| 2019 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.1% |
| 2020 | 0.8831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.7% |
| 2021 | 0.9315 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.5% |
| 2022 | 0.936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2023 | 0.9345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2024 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.2% |
Tuvalu compared with similar countries
- Tuvalu's 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Tuvalu's 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.3386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 3.5× the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tuvalu changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | +70.6% | 0.5231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8922 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.7779 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.6091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tuvalu
More reference data data for Tuvalu
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0095 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.45 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tuvalu?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tuvalu was 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
- The highest recorded value was 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- How does Tuvalu rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Tuvalu ranks 25th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Tuvalu?
- Over the last ten years it is up 126.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.