Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Portugal
Portugal: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Portugal, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Portugal stood at 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.5% on the previous year and down 0.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Portugal peaked at 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.
That places Portugal 20th out of 206 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
- 17 Greenland 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 18 Liechtenstein 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 19 United Kingdom 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 21 Czechia 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 22 San Marino 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 23 Uruguay 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Portugal
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5144 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4372 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2572 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Portugal?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Portugal was 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- How does Portugal rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Portugal ranks 20th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.