Tuvalu vs United Kingdom: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Tuvalu
1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
United Kingdom
1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Tuvalu rank
21st
United Kingdom rank
19th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Tuvalu
  • United Kingdom
00.511.5199620102025

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Tuvalu ranks 21st and United Kingdom ranks 19th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tuvalu averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tuvalu United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1990s 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3931 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tuvalu
2000s 0.8266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United Kingdom
2010s 0.7055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6822 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United Kingdom
2020s 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1702 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Tuvalu or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tuvalu as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Tuvalu and United Kingdom?
0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tuvalu and United Kingdom?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Tuvalu and United Kingdom rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Tuvalu ranks 21st and United Kingdom ranks 19th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tuvalu vs United Kingdom: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/tuvalu/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/tuvalu/united-kingdom/">Tuvalu vs United Kingdom: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.