Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia
Czechia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Czechia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Czechia is 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 3.1% on the previous year and up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Czechia peaked at 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0.5681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Czechia ranks 24th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.7819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.0% |
| 2000 | 0.5681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.4% |
| 2002 | 0.848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +49.3% |
| 2003 | 0.895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.7941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.3% |
| 2005 | 0.9347 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.7% |
| 2006 | 0.9263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2007 | 0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2008 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.6% |
| 2009 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2010 | 0.9316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.8% |
| 2011 | 0.9131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2012 | 0.8851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2013 | 0.9173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.6% |
| 2014 | 0.9672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.9813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2016 | 0.9938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.3% |
| 2017 | 0.8516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.3% |
| 2018 | 0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.6% |
| 2019 | 0.9243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.7% |
| 2020 | 0.9304 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.3% |
| 2022 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.4% |
| 2023 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.8% |
| 2024 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.3% |
| 2025 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Czechia's 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +49.3% | 0.5681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.8736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.9144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9304 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
More reference data data for Czechia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1071 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5681 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.81 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Czechia?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Czechia was 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Czechia rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Czechia ranks 24th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.