Tuvalu vs Uruguay: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Tuvalu
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Tuvalu ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Tuvalu averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tuvalu | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 0.7779 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.6091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5919 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.9747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Tuvalu or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Tuvalu and Uruguay?
- 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tuvalu and Uruguay?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Tuvalu and Uruguay rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Tuvalu ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.