Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Montenegro
Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Montenegro, 1998–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Montenegro stood at 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.
The figure is up 81.6% on the previous year and up 101.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Montenegro peaked at 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024 and was at its lowest, -0.6439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Montenegro ranks 72nd of 207 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Montenegro, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1998 | -0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2000 | -0.6439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.2% |
| 2002 | -0.0659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -89.8% |
| 2003 | -0.2926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +344.0% |
| 2004 | -0.3045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.1% |
| 2005 | -0.2502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.8% |
| 2006 | 0.3035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -221.3% |
| 2007 | 0.246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.9% |
| 2008 | 0.2307 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.2% |
| 2009 | 0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.5% |
| 2010 | -0.0388 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -118.2% |
| 2011 | -0.0295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.9% |
| 2012 | 0.2011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -781.7% |
| 2013 | 0.1691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.9% |
| 2014 | 0.1944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.0% |
| 2015 | 0.1963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.0% |
| 2016 | 0.1019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -48.1% |
| 2017 | 0.1673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +64.1% |
| 2018 | 0.1125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.6% |
| 2020 | 0.0979 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.1% |
| 2022 | 0.1804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +109.5% |
| 2023 | 0.2152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.3% |
| 2024 | 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +81.6% |
Montenegro compared with similar countries
- Montenegro's 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Montenegro's 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.8873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 44% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Montenegro changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +781.7% | -0.0295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2003 | -344.0% | -0.0659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2006 | +221.3% | -0.2502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1 |
| 2000s | -0.0626 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0388 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Montenegro
More reference data data for Montenegro
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0413 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0412 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.095 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0009 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.095 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1384 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1046 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1738 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4689 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0049 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Montenegro?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Montenegro was 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Montenegro?
- The highest recorded value was 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Montenegro?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Montenegro rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Montenegro ranks 72nd out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Montenegro?
- Over the last ten years it is up 101.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Montenegro data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.