Montenegro vs Romania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Montenegro
- Romania
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Romania, a difference of 0.0036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Romania ahead.
Montenegro ranks 72nd and Romania ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Romania |
| 2000s | -0.0626 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.1166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.1941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Montenegro or Romania?
- Montenegro, at 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Montenegro and Romania?
- 0.0036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Romania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and Romania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Montenegro ranks 72nd and Romania ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.