Brazil vs Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Brazil
0.4224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Montenegro
0.3985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Brazil rank
78th
Montenegro rank
79th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Brazil
  • Montenegro
-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.4224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 78th and Montenegro ranks 79th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5891 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2000s 0.5563 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2010s 0.5589 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2020s 0.279 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Brazil or Montenegro?
Brazil, at 0.4224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Brazil and Montenegro?
0.0239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Montenegro?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Montenegro rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Brazil ranks 78th and Montenegro ranks 79th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brazil/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brazil/montenegro/">Brazil vs Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.