Ghana vs Republic of Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Ghana
0.2043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Republic of Moldova
0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Ghana rank
88th
Republic of Moldova rank
86th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Ghana
  • Republic of Moldova
-0.5-0.2500.250.5199620102024

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ghana, a difference of 0.0794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.4 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Ghana ranks 88th and Republic of Moldova ranks 86th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 3 and Republic of Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Republic of Moldova
2000s 0.2572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ghana
2010s 0.4398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0362 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ghana
2020s 0.2069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Ghana or Republic of Moldova?
Republic of Moldova, at 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ghana as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Ghana and Republic of Moldova?
0.0794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Republic of Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Ghana and Republic of Moldova rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Ghana ranks 88th and Republic of Moldova ranks 86th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Republic of Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ghana/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ghana/moldova/">Ghana vs Republic of Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.