Fiji vs Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Fiji
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0.2627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Fiji, a difference of 0.047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.2 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 90th and Moldova ranks 87th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Moldova in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Fiji |
| 2000s | -0.2328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0832 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Fiji |
| 2010s | -0.5411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 0.1079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Fiji or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 0.2627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Fiji as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Fiji and Moldova?
- 0.047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Moldova?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Moldova rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Fiji ranks 90th and Moldova ranks 87th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.