Czechia vs Latvia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Czechia
1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Latvia
1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Czechia rank
24th
Latvia rank
27th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Czechia
  • Latvia
00.250.50.7511.2199620102025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Latvia, a difference of 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 27th of 208 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1307 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2000s 0.8736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2233 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2010s 0.9144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2020s 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Czechia or Latvia?
Czechia, at 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Czechia and Latvia?
0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Czechia ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 27th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Latvia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/czechia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/czechia/latvia/">Czechia vs Latvia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.