Czechia vs San Marino: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Czechia
- San Marino
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was San Marino ahead.
Czechia ranks 21st and San Marino ranks 22nd of 206 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2000s | 0.9241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2010s | 0.9089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Czechia or San Marino?
- Czechia, at 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Czechia and San Marino?
- 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and San Marino?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and San Marino rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Czechia ranks 21st and San Marino ranks 22nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.