Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Lithuania
Lithuania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Lithuania, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Lithuania is 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.9% on the previous year and up 32.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Lithuania peaked at 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0.6449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
Lithuania ranks 25th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.8049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2000 | 0.7723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.5% |
| 2002 | 0.6449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.5% |
| 2003 | 0.7458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.7% |
| 2004 | 0.6729 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.8% |
| 2005 | 0.7721 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.7% |
| 2006 | 0.8019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.9% |
| 2007 | 0.7977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2008 | 0.8363 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.8% |
| 2009 | 0.912 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.1% |
| 2010 | 0.9249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.8747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2012 | 0.8593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2013 | 0.8629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 0.8785 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2015 | 0.8865 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 0.8481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.3% |
| 2017 | 0.8731 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.0% |
| 2018 | 0.8155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.6% |
| 2019 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.0% |
| 2020 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2021 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.6% |
| 2022 | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2023 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.0% |
| 2024 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.2% |
| 2025 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Lithuania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | +29.0% | 0.8155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.807 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.7729 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.912 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.8875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Lithuania?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Lithuania was 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does Lithuania rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Lithuania ranks 25th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.