Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Latvia
Latvia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Latvia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Latvia is 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 56.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Latvia peaked at 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, 0.4771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
That places Latvia 27th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.7004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +35.7% |
| 2000 | 0.6178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.8% |
| 2002 | 0.5503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.9% |
| 2003 | 0.6192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.5% |
| 2004 | 0.4771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.0% |
| 2005 | 0.663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +39.0% |
| 2006 | 0.6967 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.1% |
| 2007 | 0.7159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2008 | 0.7047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 0.8078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.6% |
| 2010 | 0.7981 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2011 | 0.7228 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.6483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.3% |
| 2013 | 0.6589 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2014 | 0.7319 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.1% |
| 2015 | 0.7173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2016 | 0.6888 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.0% |
| 2017 | 0.6957 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.0% |
| 2018 | 0.683 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2019 | 0.8974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +31.4% |
| 2020 | 0.9038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 0.975 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.9% |
| 2022 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.6% |
| 2023 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2024 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.0% |
| 2025 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.1× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.6503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.7242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Latvia?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Latvia was 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Latvia rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Latvia ranks 27th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 56.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.