Trading across borders: Cost to import … import US container DB06-15 in Iran
Iran: Trading across borders: Cost to import … import US container DB06-15 was 78.93 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Iran, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Iran is 78.93, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of up 26.1% on the previous year and up 290.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Iran peaked at 78.93 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 20.2, in 2005.
Iran ranks 109th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import … import US container DB06-15 in Iran, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20.2 | — |
| 2006 | 32.75 | +62.1% |
| 2007 | 40.74 | +24.4% |
| 2008 | 38.53 | -5.4% |
| 2009 | 50.8 | +31.8% |
| 2010 | 51.26 | +0.9% |
| 2011 | 54.03 | +5.4% |
| 2012 | 60 | +11.0% |
| 2013 | 62.61 | +4.3% |
| 2014 | 78.93 | +26.1% |
Iran compared with similar countries
- Iran's 78.93 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 79.55, 99% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Iran's 78.93 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 84.61, 93% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.61 | 20.2 | 50.8 | 5 |
| 2010s | 61.37 | 51.26 | 78.93 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Iran
- 106 Antigua and Barbuda 79.55 compare
- 106 Ecuador 79.55 compare
- 108 Mauritania 79.5 compare
- 109 Haiti 78.93 compare
- 109 Madagascar 78.93 compare
- 112 Yemen 78.84 compare
More reference data data for Iran
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 26.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 5.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 281.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 78.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 27,934 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 78.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 95.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.2091 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 11.62 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Iran?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Iran was 78.93 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Iran?
- The highest recorded value was 78.93 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Iran?
- The lowest recorded value was 20.2 in 2005.
- How does Iran rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Iran ranks 109th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Iran?
- Over the last ten years it is up 290.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Iran data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.