Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 79.55 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Ecuador, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 79.55 for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is up 1.0% on the previous year and up 10.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Ecuador peaked at 79.55 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 71.79, in 2005.
That places Ecuador 106th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 71.79 | — |
| 2006 | 74.29 | +3.5% |
| 2007 | 76.68 | +3.2% |
| 2008 | 72.7 | -5.2% |
| 2009 | 76.81 | +5.7% |
| 2010 | 77.01 | +0.3% |
| 2011 | 77.78 | +1.0% |
| 2012 | 77.4 | -0.5% |
| 2013 | 78.74 | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 79.55 | +1.0% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 79.55 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 79.55, 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 79.55 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 79.24, 1.0× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.45 | 71.79 | 76.81 | 5 |
| 2010s | 78.1 | 77.01 | 79.55 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 103 Romania 80 compare
- 104 Slovakia 79.82 compare
- 105 Bangladesh 79.64 compare
- 106 Antigua and Barbuda 79.55 compare
- 108 Mauritania 79.5 compare
- 109 Haiti 78.93 compare
- 109 Iran 78.93 compare
- 109 Madagascar 78.93 compare
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Ecuador?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Ecuador was 79.55 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 79.55 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 71.79 in 2005.
- How does Ecuador rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Ecuador ranks 106th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.