Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Yemen: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Iran, Islamic Republic of
78.93
in 2014
Yemen
78.84
in 2014
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
109th
Yemen rank
112th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Yemen
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 78.93 against 78.84 in Yemen, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Yemen ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 109th and Yemen ranks 112th of 183 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.61 | 56.12 | 19.51 | Yemen |
| 2010s | 61.37 | 75.46 | 14.09 | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Yemen?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 78.93 against 78.84 in Yemen as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Yemen?
- 0.09, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Yemen?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Yemen rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 109th and Yemen ranks 112th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.