Haiti vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Haiti
78.93
in 2014
Iran, Islamic Republic of
78.93
in 2014
Haiti rank
109th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
109th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Haiti
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 78.93 against 78.93 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 109th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.58 | 36.61 | 18.98 | Haiti |
| 2010s | 75.2 | 61.37 | 13.83 | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Haiti or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Haiti, at 78.93 against 78.93 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Haiti and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Haiti and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Haiti ranks 109th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 109th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.