Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Antigua and Barbuda
Antigua and Barbuda: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 79.55 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Antigua and Barbuda, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Antigua and Barbuda is 79.55, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.0% on the previous year and up 37.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Antigua and Barbuda peaked at 79.55 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 57.85, in 2005.
That places Antigua and Barbuda 106th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Antigua and Barbuda, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 57.85 | — |
| 2006 | 59.87 | +3.5% |
| 2007 | 73.59 | +22.9% |
| 2008 | 75.56 | +2.7% |
| 2009 | 76.9 | +1.8% |
| 2010 | 78.57 | +2.2% |
| 2011 | 78.57 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | 77.75 | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 77.96 | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 79.55 | +2.0% |
Antigua and Barbuda compared with similar countries
- Antigua and Barbuda's 79.55 is below the median for high income countries, which is 87.9, 91% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Antigua and Barbuda's 79.55 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 79.24, 1.0× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.75 | 57.85 | 76.9 | 5 |
| 2010s | 78.48 | 77.75 | 79.55 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Antigua and Barbuda
More reference data data for Antigua and Barbuda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0141 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0035 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0493 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Antigua and Barbuda was 79.55 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The highest recorded value was 79.55 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The lowest recorded value was 57.85 in 2005.
- How does Antigua and Barbuda rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 106th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 37.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Antigua and Barbuda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.