Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Mauritania
Mauritania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 79.5 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Mauritania, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Mauritania is 79.5, measured in 2014.
That represents a change of down 1.6% on the previous year and up 15.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Mauritania peaked at 81.7 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 69.15, in 2005.
Mauritania ranks 108th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Mauritania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 69.15 | — |
| 2006 | 72.41 | +4.7% |
| 2007 | 77.73 | +7.3% |
| 2008 | 75.76 | -2.5% |
| 2009 | 75.91 | +0.2% |
| 2010 | 72.14 | -5.0% |
| 2011 | 78.2 | +8.4% |
| 2012 | 81.7 | +4.5% |
| 2013 | 80.77 | -1.1% |
| 2014 | 79.5 | -1.6% |
Mauritania compared with similar countries
- Mauritania's 79.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 79.21, 1.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Mauritania's 79.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 70.57, 1.1× the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.19 | 69.15 | 77.73 | 5 |
| 2010s | 78.46 | 72.14 | 81.7 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mauritania
- 105 Bangladesh 79.64 compare
- 106 Antigua and Barbuda 79.55 compare
- 106 Ecuador 79.55 compare
- 109 Haiti 78.93 compare
- 109 Iran 78.93 compare
- 109 Madagascar 78.93 compare
More reference data data for Mauritania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0975 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0216 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.327 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1337 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 14.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1178 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Mauritania?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Mauritania was 79.5 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Mauritania?
- The highest recorded value was 81.7 in 2012.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Mauritania?
- The lowest recorded value was 69.15 in 2005.
- How does Mauritania rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Mauritania ranks 108th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Mauritania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mauritania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.