What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Antigua and Barbuda and Iran, Islamic Republic of?

0.62, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Iran, Islamic Republic of?

10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Antigua and Barbuda vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)

Antigua and Barbuda

79.55

in 2014

Iran, Islamic Republic of

78.93

in 2014

Antigua and Barbuda rank

106th

Iran, Islamic Republic of rank

109th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time

Antigua and Barbuda
Iran, Islamic Republic of

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 79.55 against 78.93 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.62.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 106th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 109th of 184 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Antigua and Barbuda	Iran, Islamic Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	68.75	36.61	32.15	Antigua and Barbuda
2010s	78.48	61.37	17.11	Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Antigua and Barbuda or Iran, Islamic Republic of?: Antigua and Barbuda, at 79.55 against 78.93 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Antigua and Barbuda and Iran, Islamic Republic of?: 0.62, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Iran, Islamic Republic of?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?: Antigua and Barbuda ranks 106th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 109th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/antigua-and-barbuda/iran-islamic-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/antigua-and-barbuda/iran-islamic-rep/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.