Antigua and Barbuda vs Slovakia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Antigua and Barbuda
79.55
in 2014
Slovakia
79.82
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
106th
Slovakia rank
104th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 79.82 against 79.55 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovakia ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 104th of 184 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.75 | 83.56 | 14.81 | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 78.48 | 79.13 | 0.6538 | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Antigua and Barbuda or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 79.82 against 79.55 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Antigua and Barbuda and Slovakia?
- 0.27, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Slovakia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Slovakia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 104th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.