Antigua and Barbuda vs Haiti: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Antigua and Barbuda
79.55
in 2014
Haiti
78.93
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
106th
Haiti rank
109th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Haiti
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 79.55 against 78.93 in Haiti, a difference of 0.62.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 106th and Haiti ranks 109th of 184 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.75 | 55.58 | 13.17 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 78.48 | 75.2 | 3.28 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Antigua and Barbuda or Haiti?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 79.55 against 78.93 in Haiti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Antigua and Barbuda and Haiti?
- 0.62, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Haiti?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Haiti rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 106th and Haiti ranks 109th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.