Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Morocco
Morocco: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 46.67 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Morocco, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Morocco stood at 46.67. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of up 75.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Morocco peaked at 46.67 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 26.67, in 2005.
Morocco ranks 115th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Morocco, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 26.67 | — |
| 2006 | 26.67 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 26.67 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 26.67 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 26.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 30 | +12.5% |
| 2011 | 46.67 | +55.6% |
| 2012 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
Morocco compared with similar countries
- Morocco's 46.67 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 46.67, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Morocco's 46.67 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 46.67, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.67 | 26.67 | 26.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 42.5 | 30 | 46.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Morocco
- 115 Russia 46.67 compare
- 115 Bahamas 46.67 compare
- 115 Bhutan 46.67 compare
- 115 Bosnia and Herzegovina 46.67 compare
- 115 Croatia 46.67 compare
- 115 Netherlands 46.67 compare
- 115 Serbia 46.67 compare
- 115 Slovakia 46.67 compare
- 115 Syria 46.67 compare
- 115 Tonga 46.67 compare
- 115 Uganda 46.67 compare
- 115 Zimbabwe 46.67 compare
More reference data data for Morocco
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4441 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4159 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 21.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.42 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Morocco?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Morocco was 46.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Morocco?
- The highest recorded value was 46.67 in 2011.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Morocco?
- The lowest recorded value was 26.67 in 2005.
- How does Morocco rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Morocco ranks 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Morocco?
- Over the last ten years it is up 75.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Morocco data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.