Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 46.67 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 46.67, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 46.67 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 46.67, in 2005.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 115th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 46.67 | — |
| 2006 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 46.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 46.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 115 Russian Federation 46.67 compare
- 115 Bahamas 46.67 compare
- 115 Bhutan 46.67 compare
- 115 Croatia 46.67 compare
- 115 Morocco 46.67 compare
- 115 Netherlands 46.67 compare
- 115 Serbia 46.67 compare
- 115 Slovakia 46.67 compare
- 115 Syria 46.67 compare
- 115 Tonga 46.67 compare
- 115 Uganda 46.67 compare
- 115 Zimbabwe 46.67 compare
More reference data data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2599 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6521 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0577 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.6521 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8716 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5521 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.7607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3142 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 46.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 46.67 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 46.67 in 2005.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.