Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Croatia
Croatia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 46.67 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Croatia, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Croatia is 46.67, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is up 16.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Croatia peaked at 46.67 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 40, in 2005.
That places Croatia 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Croatia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 40 | — |
| 2006 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 46.67 | +16.7% |
| 2010 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
Croatia compared with similar countries
- Croatia's 46.67 is below the median for high income countries, which is 56.67, 82% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Croatia's 46.67 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 60, 78% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.33 | 40 | 46.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 46.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Croatia
- 115 Russia 46.67 compare
- 115 Bahamas 46.67 compare
- 115 Bhutan 46.67 compare
- 115 Bosnia and Herzegovina 46.67 compare
- 115 Morocco 46.67 compare
- 115 Netherlands 46.67 compare
- 115 Serbia 46.67 compare
- 115 Slovakia 46.67 compare
- 115 Syria 46.67 compare
- 115 Tonga 46.67 compare
- 115 Uganda 46.67 compare
- 115 Zimbabwe 46.67 compare
More reference data data for Croatia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2598 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1516 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1326 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8711 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5399 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6476 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7218 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Croatia?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Croatia was 46.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 46.67 in 2009.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2005.
- How does Croatia rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Croatia ranks 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.