Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Syria
Syria: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 46.67 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Syria, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Syria recorded 46.67 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of up 7.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Syria peaked at 46.67 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 43.33, in 2005.
That places Syria 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Syria, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 43.33 | — |
| 2006 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 46.67 | +7.7% |
| 2011 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
Syria compared with similar countries
- Syria's 46.67 is above the median for low income countries, which is 35, 1.3× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Syria's 46.67 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 46.67, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 43.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 46.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Syria
- 115 Russia 46.67 compare
- 115 Bahamas 46.67 compare
- 115 Bhutan 46.67 compare
- 115 Bosnia and Herzegovina 46.67 compare
- 115 Croatia 46.67 compare
- 115 Morocco 46.67 compare
- 115 Netherlands 46.67 compare
- 115 Serbia 46.67 compare
- 115 Slovakia 46.67 compare
- 115 Tonga 46.67 compare
- 115 Uganda 46.67 compare
- 115 Zimbabwe 46.67 compare
More reference data data for Syria
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1191 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5377 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3995 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1542 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 29.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.93 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Syria?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Syria was 46.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Syria?
- The highest recorded value was 46.67 in 2010.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Syria?
- The lowest recorded value was 43.33 in 2005.
- How does Syria rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Syria ranks 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Syria?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Syria data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.